NOT a parallel, but a contrast, since at all points Peace is Brodie's
antithesis. The one is the austerest of Classics, caring only for the
ultimate perfection of his work. The other is the gayest of Romantics,
happiest when by the way he produces a glittering effect, or dazzles the
ear by a vain impertinence. Now, it is by thievery that Peace reached
magnificence. A natural aptitude drove him from the fiddle to the
centre-bit. He did but rob, because genius followed the impulse. He had
studied the remotest details of his business; he was sternly professional
in the conduct of his life, and, as became an old gaol-bird, there was no
antic of the policeman wherewith he was not familiar. Moreover, not only
had he reduced house-breaking to a science, but, being ostensibly nothing
better than a picture-frame maker, he had invented an incomparable set of
tools wherewith to enter and evade his neighbour's house. Brodie, on the
other hand, was a thief for distraction. His method was as slovenly as
ignorance could make it. Though by trade a wright, and therefore a master
of all the arts of joinery, he was so deficient in seriousness that he
stole a coulter wherewith to batter the walls of the Excise Office. While
Peace fought the battle in solitude, Brodie was not only attended by a
gang, but listened to the command of his subordinates, and was never
permitted to perform a more intricate duty than the sounding of the alarm.
And yet here is the ironical contrast. Peace, the professional thief,
despised his brothers, and was never heard to patter a word of flash.
Brodie, the amateur, courted the society of all cross coves, and would
rather express himself in Pedlar's French than in his choicest Scots.
While the Englishman scraped Tate and Brady from a one-stringed fiddle,
the Scot limped a chaunt from The Beggar's Opera, and thought himself a
devil of a fellow. The one was a man about town masquerading as a thief;
the other the most serious among housebreakers, singing psalms in all good
faith.
But if Peace was incomparably the better craftsman, Brodie was the
prettier gentleman. Peace would not have permitted Brodie to drive his
pony-trap the length of Evelina Road. But Brodie, in revenge, would have
cut Peace had he met him in the Corn-market. The one was a sombre savage,
the other a jovial comrade, and it was a witty freak of fortune that
impelled both to follow the same trade. And thus you arrive at another
point of difference. The Englishman had no intelligence of life's amenity.
He knew naught of costume: clothes were the limit of his ambition. Dressed
always for work, he was like the caterpillar which assumes the green of
the leaf, wherein it hides: he wore only such duds as should attract the
smallest notice, and separate him as far as might be from his business.
But the Scot was as fine a dandy as ever took (haphazard) to the cracking
of kens. If his refinement permitted no excess of splendour, he went ever
gloriously and appropriately apparelled. He was well-mannered, cultured,
with scarce a touch of provincialism to mar his gay demeanour: whereas
Peace knew little enough outside the practice of burglary, and the proper
handling of the revolver.
Our Charles, for example, could neither spell nor write; he dissembled his
low origin with the utmost difficulty, and at the best was plastered over
(when not at work) with the parochialism of the suburbs. So far the
contrast is complete; and even in their similarities there is an evident
difference. Each led a double life; but while Brodie was most himself
among his own kind, the real Peace was to be found not fiddle-scraping in
Evelina Road but marking down policemen in the dusky byways of Blackheath.
Brodie's grandeur was natural to him; Peace's respectability, so far as it
transcended the man's origin, was a cloak of villainy.
Each, again, was an inventor, and while the more innocent Brodie designed
a gallows, the more hardened Peace would have gained notoriety by the
raising of wrecks and the patronage of Mr. Plimsoll. And since both
preserved a certain courage to the end, since both died on the scaffold as
becomes a man, the contrast is once more characteristic. Brodie's cynicism
is a fine foil to the piety of Peace; and while each end was natural after
its own fashion, there is none who will deny to the Scot the finer sense
of fitness. Nor did any step in their career explain more clearly the
difference in their temperament than their definitions of the gallows. For
Peace it is 'a short cut to Heaven'; for Brodie it is 'a leap in the
dark.' Again the Scot has the advantage. Again you reflect that, if Peace
is the most accomplished Classic among the housebreakers, the Deacon is
the merriest companion who ever climbed the gallows by the shoulders of
the incomparable Macheath.
