In the early seventies a group of students—dissatisfied
with the cut-and-dried instruction of the Paris art school and
attracted by certain qualities of color and technique in the work
of a young Frenchman from the city of Lille, who was just
beginning to attract the attention of connoisseurs—went in
a body to his studio with the request that he would oversee their
work and direct their studies. The artist thus chosen was
Carolus-Duran. Oddly enough, a majority of the youths who
sought him out and made him their master were Americans.
The first modest workroom on the Boulevard Montparnasse was
soon too small to hold the pupils who crowded under this newly
raised banner, and a move was made to more commodious quarters
near the master’s private studio. Sargent, Dannat,
Harrison, Beckwith, Hinckley, and many others whom it is needless
to mention here, will—if these lines come under their
notice—doubtless recall with a thrill of pleasure the roomy
one-storied structure in the rue Notre-Dame des Champs where we
established our atelier d’élèves, a
self-supporting cooperative concern, each student contributing
ten francs a month toward rent, fire, and models,
“Carolus”—the name by which this master is
universally known abroad—not only refusing all
compensation, according to the immutable custom of French
painters of distinction, but, as we discovered later,
contributing too often from his own pocket to help out the
massier at the end of a difficult season, or smooth the
path of some improvident pupil.
Those were cloudless, enchanted days we passed in the tumbled
down old atelier: an ardent springtime of life when the future
beckons gayly and no doubts of success obscure the horizon.
Our young master’s enthusiasm fired his circle of pupils,
who, as each succeeding year brought him increasing fame,
revelled in a reflected glory with the generous admiration of
youth, in which there is neither calculation nor shadow of
envy.
A portrait of Madame de Portalais, exhibited about this time,
drew all art-loving Paris around the new celebrity’s
canvas. Shortly after, the government purchased a painting
(of our master’s beautiful wife), now known as La Femme
au Gant, for the Luxembourg Gallery.
It is difficult to overestimate the impetus that a
master’s successes impart to the progress of his
pupils. My first studious year in Paris had been passed in
the shadow of an elderly painter, who was comfortably dozing on
the laurels of thirty years before. The change from that
sleepy environment to the vivid enthusiasm and dash of
Carolus-Duran’s studio was like stepping out of a musty
cloister into the warmth and movement of a market-place.
Here, be it said in passing, lies perhaps the secret of the
dry rot that too often settles on our American art schools.
We, for some unknown reason, do not take the work of native
painters seriously, nor encourage them in proportion to their
merit. In consequence they retain but a feeble hold upon
their pupils.
Carolus, handsome, young, successful, courted, was an ideal
leader for a band of ambitious, high-strung youths, repaying
their devotion with an untiring interest and lifting clever and
dull alike on the strong wings of his genius. His visits to
the studio, on which his friend Henner often accompanied him,
were frequent and prolonged; certain Tuesdays being especially
appreciated by us, as they were set apart for his criticism of
original compositions.
When our sketches (the subject for which had been given out in
advance) were arranged, and we had seated ourselves in a big
half-circle on the floor, Carolus would install himself on a tall
stool, the one seat the studio boasted, and chat à
propos of the works before him on composition, on classic
art, on the theories of color and clair-obscur. Brilliant
talks, inlaid with much wit and incisive criticism, the memory of
which must linger in the minds of all who were fortunate enough
to hear them. Nor was it to the studio alone that our
master’s interest followed us. He would drop in at
the Louvre, when we were copying there, and after some pleasant
words of advice and encouragement, lead us off for a stroll
through the galleries, interrupted by stations before his
favorite masterpieces.
So important has he always considered a constant study of
Renaissance art that recently, when about to commence his
Triumph of Bacchus, Carolus copied one of Rubens’s
larger canvases with all the naïveté of a
beginner.
An occasion soon presented itself for us to learn another side
of our trade by working with our master on a ceiling ordered of
him by the state for the Palace of the Luxembourg. The vast
studios which the city of Paris provides on occasions of this
kind, with a liberality that should make our home corporations
reflect, are situated out beyond the Exhibition buildings, in a
curious, unfrequented quarter, ignored alike by Parisians and
tourists, where the city stores compromising statues and the
valuable débris of her many revolutions. There,
among throneless Napoleons and riderless bronze steeds, we toiled
for over six months side by side with our master, on gigantic
Apotheosis of Marie de Médicis, serving in turn as
painter and painted, and leaving the imprint of our hands and the
reflection of our faces scattered about the composition.
Day after day, when work was over, we would hoist the big canvas
by means of a system of ropes and pulleys, from a perpendicular
to the horizontal position it was to occupy permanently, and then
sit straining our necks and discussing the progress of the work
until the tardy spring twilight warned us to depart.
The year 1877 brought Carolus-Duran the médaille
d’honneur, a crowning recompense that set the atelier
mad with delight. We immediately organized a great (but
economical) banquet to commemorate the event, over which our
master presided, with much modesty, considering the amount of
incense we burned before him, and the speeches we made. One
of our number even burst into some very bad French verses,
asserting that the painters of the world in general fell back
before him—
. . . épouvantès—
Craignant ègalement sa brosse et son èpèe.
Craignant ègalement sa brosse et son èpèe.
This allusion to his proficiency in fencing was considered
particularly neat, and became the favorite song of the studio, to
be howled in and out of season.
Curiously enough, there is always something in
Carolus-Duran’s attitude when at work which recalls the
swordsman. With an enormous palette in one hand and a brush
in the other, he has a way of planting himself in front of his
sitter that is amusingly suggestive of a duel. His lithe
body sways to and fro, his fine leonine face quivers with the
intense study of his model; then with a sudden spring forward, a
few rapid touches are dashed on the canvas (like home strokes in
the enemy’s weakest spot) with a precision of hand acquired
only by long years of fencing.
An order to paint the king and queen of Portugal was the next
step on the road to fame, another rung on the pleasant ladder of
success. When this work was done the delighted sovereign
presented the painter with the order of “Christ of
Portugal,” together with many other gifts, among which a
caricature of the master at work, signed by his sitter, is not
the least valued.
When the great schism occurred several years ago which rent
the art world of France, Carolus-Duran was elected vice-president
of the new school under Meissonier, to whose office he succeeded
on that master’s death; and now directs and presides over
the yearly exhibition known as the Salon du Champ de
Mars.
At his château near Paris or at Saint Raphael, on the
Mediterranean, the master lives, like Leonardo of old, the
existence of a grand seigneur, surrounded by his family,
innumerable guests, and the horses and dogs he loves,—a
group of which his ornate figure and expressive face form the
natural centre. Each year he lives more away from the
world, but no more inspiriting sight can be imagined than the
welcome the president receives of a “varnishing” day,
when he makes his entry surrounded by his pupils. The
students cheer themselves hoarse, and the public climbs on
everything that comes to hand to see him pass. It is hard
to realize then that this is the same man who, not content with
his youthful progress, retired into an Italian monastery that he
might commune face to face with nature undisturbed.
The works of no other painter give me the same sensation of
quivering vitality, except the Velasquez in the Madrid Gallery
and, perhaps, Sargent at his best; and one feels all through the
American painter’s work the influence of his first and only
master.
“Tout ce qui n’est pas indispensable est
nuisible,” a phrase which is often on
Carolus-Duran’s lips, may be taken as the keynote of his
work, where one finds a noble simplicity of line and color
scheme, an elimination of useless detail, a contempt for tricks
to enforce an effect, and above all a comprehension and mastery
of light, vitality, and texture—those three unities of the
painter’s art—that bring his canvases very near to
those of his self-imposed Spanish master.
Those who know the French painter’s more important works
and his many splendid studies from the nude, feel it a pity that
such masterpieces as the equestrian portrait of Mlle. Croisette,
of the Comédie Française, the Réveil,
the superb full length of Mme. Pelouse on the Terrace of
Chenonceau, and the head of Gounod in the Luxembourg, could not
be collected into one exhibition, that lovers of art here in
America might realize for themselves how this master’s
works are of the class that typify a school and an epoch, and
engrave their author’s name among those destined to become
household words in the mouths of future generations.
